Eliminating Death -- Part 5 -- The "Playing God" Argument -- Video

G. Stolyarov II
 
Issue CLXXXII 
December 29, 2008
Recommend this page.
A sample image

In this video, Mr. Stolyarov addresses the objection leveled by some monotheists of the three Abrahamic faiths at the prospect of indefinite life extension – namely, the argument that those who pursue indefinite longevity are “playing God.” Mr. Stolyarov notes that the definition of the Abrahamic God as simultaneously omnipotent, omniscient, and omnibenevolent renders “playing God” impossible for human beings, since humans – no matter how technologically advanced – will never have the attributes that believers consider the Abrahamic God to possess. Moreover, the “playing God” argument can be and has been used against technologies that have been developed throughout human history and which are used by many religious people today. There is no difference in kind between using this argument against existing technologies and using it against forthcoming ones; therefore, the “playing God” argument fails even from the perspective of thinking believers in God.

Please help promote this video by going to this page and giving it a rating of five stars, as well as embedding it on your websites and sharing it with others.


Recommend this page.

This TRA feature has been edited in accordance with TRA's Statement of Policy.

Click here to return to TRA's Issue CLXXXII Index.

Learn about Mr. Stolyarov's novel, Eden against the Colossus, here.

Read Mr. Stolyarov's comprehensive treatise, A Rational Cosmology, explicating such terms as the universe, matter, space, time, sound, light, life, consciousness, and volition, here.

Read Mr. Stolyarov's four-act play, Implied Consent, a futuristic intellectual drama on the sanctity of human life, here.