The Global Warming
Debate:
As Skeptics Score
Points,
the Climate Starts
to Change
Tom DeWeese
Issue XCVIII- May 1, 2007
|
-----------------------------------
Principal Index
-----------------------------------
Old
Superstructure
-----------------------------------
Old Master Index
-----------------------------------
Contributors
-----------------------------------
The Rational Business Journal
-----------------------------------
Forum
-----------------------------------
Yahoo! Group
-----------------------------------
Gallery of Rational
Art
-----------------------------------
Online
Store
-----------------------------------
Henry Ford Award
-----------------------------------
Johannes
Gutenberg Award
-----------------------------------
CMFF:
Fight Death
-----------------------------------
Eden against the
Colossus
-----------------------------------
A
Rational Cosmology
-----------------------------------
Links
-----------------------------------
Mr.
Stolyarov's Articles on Helium.com
-----------------------------------
Mr. Stolyarov's Articles on Associated Content
-----------------------------------
Mr.
Stolyarov's Articles on GrasstopsUSA.com
-----------------------------------
Submit/Contact
-----------------------------------
Statement of Policy
-----------------------------------
|
With great fanfare, in
March, Al Gore took Capital
Hill like a conquering
hero as he testified on
Global Warming before both
houses of Congress. Fresh
from conquests at the
Academy Awards, where his
adoring Hollywood elites
showered him with coveted
golden statues for spreading
their favorite propaganda,
Gore was determined to turn
his personal conquest into
draconian federal law and
ultimate human misery.
Gore's words to Congress
were predictable. The earth
is warming. The polar ice
caps are melting. Polar
bears are on the run. And
it's man's fault. Solution?
Ban or control human
activities. The mantra of
the religion of Global
Warming is getting a little
boring. It's quite possible,
however, that Gore's
appearance on the Hill
actually represents the
beginning of the end of his
influence on climate policy
rather than the start of a
legislative tsunami.
Why? Because even after the
Global Warming storm
troopers, armed with
billions of dollars, the
backing of the Hollywood
elite, the news media, and
most of academia have done
everything possible to
threaten, bully, and force
their one-sided propaganda
on us, the so-called global
warming skeptics seem to be
coming out of their hiding
places in ever greater
numbers. The debate is now
taking a dramatic change. As
the skeptic side is heard,
more Americans are beginning
to understand that there are
legitimate reasons for
skepticism. Here are just a
few of the latest
developments.
Item: Just days
before Gore's charge up
Capitol Hill, a
high-profile climate debate
between prominent scientists
ended with global warming
skeptics being voted the
clear winner. Before the
start of the debate, held in
New York City, the
audience polled 57.3% to
29.9% in favor of believing
that Global Warming was a
crisis. But following the
debate, the numbers
completely flipped to 46.2%
to 42.2% in favor of the
skeptical point of view.
Conclusion - when people
hear both sides, they can
easily judge for themselves
what is truth.
Item: On March 13,
The New York Times,
one of the most adamant
promoters of the Global
Warming gospel, published a
landmark article, stating,
"scientists argue that some
of (former Vice President
Al) Gore 's central
points are exaggerated and
erroneous."
Item: French
scientist Claude Allègre,
a prominent French Socialist
and supporter of Global
Warming dogma, recanted his
belief in man-made
catastrophic global warming
and now says promotion of
the idea is motivated by
money.
Item: One of Israel's
top young scientists, Nir
Shaviv, recently reversed
his opinion, declaring that
the link between emissions
and climate variability has
nothing more than
"circumstantial evidence."
Item: The United
Kingdom's famed
environmental activist David
Bellamy also recently
converted to skepticism, as
did Meteorologist Reid
Bryson, who has switched
from the 1970's global
cooling scare to a global
warming skeptic.
Item: A report by the
Heartland Institute,
entitled, "What Climate
Scientists Really Say About
Global Warming," exposes the
weakness of the "consensus"
claims of Global Warming
shock troops. To reach its
findings, the report
examined two surveys
conducted among climate
scientists: the first in
1996, and the second in
2003. Both surveys confirm
scientists are divided on
the issue. Says the report -
- More climate
scientists "strongly
disagree" than "strongly
agree" with the notion
that climate change is
caused by humans.
- Most climate
scientists do not believe
"the current state of
knowledge is able to
provide reasonable
predictions of climate
variability" over 100-year
periods.
- Only 2 percent of
climate scientists
surveyed "strongly agree"
that modeling programs
designed to predict
climate changes are
accurate, and
- Almost all climate
scientists agree that
climate change could have
"positive effects for some
societies."
Item: After Global
Warming propagandists rushed
to declare that the UN's
Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change (IPCC) report
proved conclusively that
Global Warming was caused by
human action, (a report, by
the way, that won't be
released until May), the
just released summary
predicts less global warming
than was forecast by
previous IPCC reports.
Item: New research by
international scientists is
revealing that the sun has
been a major driver of
climate variability. Solar
specialist Henrik Svensmark
of the Danish National Space
Center explained, "We have
the highest solar activity
we have had in at least
1,000 years."
As
Senator James Inhofe
(R-OK) sums it up, "The
usual suspects will still
insist that there is a
'consensus' of scientists
who agree with Gore. And
yes, many governing boards
and spokesmen of science
institutions must toe the
politically correct line of
Gore-inspired science, but
rank-and-file scientists are
now openly rebelling."
As real debate finally
forces fact over
headline-making one-liners,
the truth will become ever
more inconvenient to Al Gore
and his Global Warming
zealots.
Tom DeWeese
is one of the nation’s
leading advocates of
individual liberty, free
enterprise, property rights
and back-to-basics
education. For over thirty
years he has fought against
government oppression.
In 1988 Tom
established the
American Policy Center
(APC), an activist think
tank headquartered in
Warrenton, VA. In 1992 Tom
DeWeese became passionately
involved in the fight for
the preservation of American
private property rights and
against intrusive
environmental regulations.
He is also a recognized
leader in the fight to
preserve American national
sovereignty from intrusive
United Nations policies on
global governance. APC has
also joined the fight to
rescue American education
from federal intrusion and
the fight for American
privacy rights against
intrusive government data
banks, and a national
identification card.
Mr. DeWeese
makes regular appearances on
radio and television talk
shows and has articles
published in several
national publications.
Tom DeWeese
is the publisher/editor of
The DeWeese Report You
may contact Mr. DeWeese
here. |
|
|
|
|
This TRA feature has been edited in accordance
with TRA’s
Statement of Policy.
Click here to return to TRA's Issue XCVIII Index.
Learn about Mr. Stolyarov's
novel, Eden against the Colossus, here.
Read
Mr. Stolyarov's new comprehensive treatise,
A Rational Cosmology, explicating such
terms as the universe, matter, space, time, sound,
light, life, consciousness, and volition, at
http://www.geocities.com/rational_argumentator/rc.html.
|