Two famous men died last week. One was a great
thinker, the other – a vile dictator and despicable thug. This will not be an
obituary for either of them. Kim Jong Il did not deserve an obituary, and
Christopher Hitchens would have preferred a different treatment. I was shocked
by Hitchens’s sudden death from pneumonia, as he had just days before published
his “Trial of the Will” – an essay that strongly suggested that he had at least
several months of life left in him. But such is the fundamental injustice of
death – a horror that indiscriminately visits even the best of us.
Instead of an obituary, I offer today a discussion
of one of Hitchens’s ideas – helping in this way to keep his thought alive, as
he would surely have wished. I will try here to generalize from Hitchens’s
observations and take them a bit further, in the interests of continuing the
intellectual conversation.
In 2010,
Hitchens published a powerful article in Slate, titled “A Nation of Racist
Dwarfs” – discussing his unique and insightful impressions of some overlooked
elements of North Korean totalitarianism. What struck Hitchens about North
Korea under Kim Jong Il was not so the so-called communism of its regime, but
rather its racist and nationalist bigotry. Hitchens noted that this was
entirely consistent with the totalitarian mentality of Kim Jong Il, because, in Hitchens’s words, “nothing is
more ‘total’ than racist nationalism”.
Hitchens rightly pointed out that “race arrogance and nationalist hysteria are
powerful cements for the most odious systems” – no matter what they call
themselves.
For all his theoretical flaws, Karl Marx was an
internationalist; he wanted an international
socialism that transcended national or ethnic allegiances – hence the slogan,
“Workers of the world, unite!” Marx even opposed the emerging welfare-statism
of Otto von Bismarck and Benjamin Disraeli on the grounds that it would appease
too many people through superficial wealth redistribution, while hindering the
true international workers’ revolution that Marx and Friedrich Engels saw as
the wave of the future. But the mentality
of top-down central planning – that of the “dictatorship of the proletariat” –
infected Marxist thought in the early 20th century, particularly
through the ideology of Lenin and Stalin. The path down which North Korea has
gone is a logical conclusion of that central-planning mindset; it is utter
desolation combined with xenophobic ultra-nationalism. There can be no
internationalism, no cosmopolitanism, no progress for all human beings, under
central planning. Those who try to homogenize and dictate the economy will
inevitably come to homogenize and dictate the culture – and will have no
tolerance for dissent or substantive difference in either realm. Furthermore,
Hitchens’s observations confirm that the central-planning mentality cannot
produce the prodigious “new socialist man” conceived by Trotsky; it can only
create stunted bigots.
As I expressed previously in “The Perils of Cultural Homogeneity”, any attempts
to impose one uniform lifestyle or ideology upon a people will result in the
rule of a few entrenched elites. Kim Jong Il and his oligarchy of cronies were
an extreme example of this more general principle. There can never be a true
“dictatorship of the proletariat”. There can only be a dictatorship of a
handful perverse parasites, ruling in the name of the proletariat, gradually
shedding even that pretense in favor of cultivating outright leader-worship in
the general population. The legacy of Kim Jong Il has been to show just how far
into the depths of depravity the central-planning, homogenizing mindset can
plunge an entire society of human beings. The legacy of Christopher Hitchens
has been to stand out as a light of reason and friend of liberty, an incisive
observer of evil and a champion of its antidote: the individual creator, the
indomitable human spirit that – alas – can be killed, but which can never be
truly conquered by tyranny. It
saddens me that Christopher Hitchens died a few days too early to see the news
of Kim Jong Il’s demise. But, given the secretive practices of North Korean
news media, there is a good chance that Hitchens actually outlived the dictator
and we just did not find out about Kim’s death for several days. Regardless, a
window of opportunity has now arisen in North Korea – and I sincerely hope that
the political instability there will lead to a regime collapse, a breath of
freedom, and an opening-up to the world. Maybe someday, future generations of
North Koreans will be reading Hitchens and shaking their heads at their country’s
abysmal past.
The
Rational Argumentator