EPA's Texas Power Grab

Any Texas granddaddy will tell you
he’s seen it all, when it comes to weather and climate extremes. Tornadoes,
hurricanes, heat waves, blizzards, droughts, flash floods, and storms that
bring unique combinations of wind, dust, thunder and hail.
Any Lone Star citizen will point out
that Texas is America’s leading producer of crude oil, natural gas and (heavily
subsidized) wind-based energy. It has the second-largest workforce and gross
state product in the USA, produces more electricity than any other state, and
refines one-fourth of our petroleum – for a country that is 85% dependent on
fossil fuels.
Mess with Texas, and the damages
will reverberate throughout our nation.
So why is the US Environmental
Protection Agency sending federal agents to Texas – to arrest the state’s
economy for the “crime” of emitting carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane
(CH4)? Texas is also challenging EPA over other arbitrary new air
pollution standards, but that’s another article.
Cowboys and cowgirls recognize CO2
as the plant-fertilizing “gas of life” and CH4 as natural gas and
cow flatulence. Scientists will tell you carbon dioxide is 0.0387% of Earth’s atmosphere
and methane is 0.000179 percent. Anyone with an eighth grade economics
education or ounce of common sense knows CO2 is what results when CH4
heats homes, generates electricity, fuels cars and factories, and makes our
health, welfare and living standards possible.
But EPA says they are “greenhouse
gases” that cause “runaway global warming.” So the ideologues who run this
agency are telling Texas to start regulating its power plants and refineries
into bankruptcy or oblivion – or EPA goons will take over its air quality
programs and economy.
Since few cowboys and cowgirls – or
even college grads or most PhDs – are experts on “greenhouse” gases and
radiation physics, let’s take a quick look at what’s behind these EPA claims.
EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson says
her agency’s actions will “protect human health and welfare” and “ensure
environmental justice,” which are “threatened” by rising temperatures and
“global climate disruption.” Let EPA regulate these evil greenhouse gases, she
promises, and the climate will remain “stable” and average global temperatures
will never be more than 2 degrees higher than now. Bunk.
Ms. Jackson willfully ignores the
immense harm that driving up energy prices will have on jobs, state revenues,
people’s health and welfare, and even human lives. But her views are supported
by scientists like Dr. Richard Alley, Michael Mann’s colleague at Pennsylvania
State University, all handsomely paid by EPA and other federal agencies for
raising alarms about global warming.
Alley was recently extolled in the New
York Times (which no real, red-blooded Texans reads) as a “major voice of
climate science.” He says that under a true worst-case scenario of doubling the
concentration of CO2 and methane, our planet will fry due to 18 to
20 degrees F of global warming.
This much gas of life and cow flatulence,
the great professor insists, would result in “an addition of heat so radical
that it would render the planet unrecognizable to its present-day inhabitants.”
He bases this horrifying prediction on computer models that assume human CO2
and CH4 control our climate – not the sun and dozens of powerful,
complex, interacting natural forces.
The fact is, mankind has been
emitting gas of life and cow flatulence since time immemorial. However,
according to MIT’s Dr. Richard Lindzen, we are still only 80% of the way toward
doubling the greenhouse gas levels found in our atmosphere at the start of the
Industrial Revolution (0.0280%). But taking Dr. Alley’s computer models and
doomsday predictions at their word, 80% of the way should mean temperatures in
the great state of Texas should have warmed some 14 to 16 degrees between 1860
and 2010.
Hooo-weee … is that HOT, or what?
Something doesn’t seem quite right
here. National Climate Data Center studies show Texas’ annual mean temperature
fluctuates from year to year – but has generally been 65 to 71 degrees F, from
1895 through 2010. (We don’t have reliable data before 1895.) From the rear
view of flatulent Texas longhorns, that’s a change of just 6 degrees, up or
down, with no two years of identical weather, for 116 years!
Where in tarnation are those extra
10 to 12 degrees of warming that Professor Alley (in his generous spirit of
“worst-case scenarios”) assures us are happening? Did the Grinch steal them? Or
are those missing degrees just lurking out there, waiting to surprise us
the instant CO2 levels hit 560 ppm (0.0560% of the atmosphere)? Does
nature actually work that way: no response, no response – then, bam!?!?
Disaster!
He and Professor Mann and Penn State
sure did get a lot of millions from us taxpayers, to cook up all these disaster
scenarios. So there must be something to them. (One of their buddies got a pile
of taxpayer cash for saying dinosaur flatulence “may have contributed to global
warming” 70 million years ago!)
But farmers and ranchers in Texas
just cannot find that missing “heat” in their cows or plants or wild grasses.
No one can find that “heat” in hurricane, tornado, hail or dust storm records,
either. In fact, NOAA tells us, strong tornadoes, among top-three ranks in wind
and damage scales, have been occurring less and less since record
intensities during 1950s and 1960s.
That’s just the opposite of what the
good professor, his sidekick Al Gore and their Climate Doomsday Gang say will
happen. But isn’t that good news for Texas?
In fact, using their logic, we could
argue that, since CO2 has been rising while tornado intensity is
falling, maybe we should increase carbon dioxide even more, to
eventually turn tornadoes into dust devils. Or say decreasing CO2
emissions could cause stronger tornadoes and damage to ramp up again.
Somehow, we don’t think carbon
dioxide or methane has quite this power. We suspect there are a lot of other,
far stronger, natural forces at work – causing all kinds of cyclical climate
patterns. Ms. Jackson and Dr. Alley’s computer-created monsters might have a
role in Frankenstein, raptor and blood-lusting alien movies. They should play
no role in dictating Texas energy use and economic decisions.
So now the alarmists from the
Climate Doomsday Gang have a new scare. Global warming from rising CO2
is going to cause more vector-borne diseases like malaria, dengue fever and
West Nile Virus. Are you a-trembling in your bull-doodoo-covered boots now?
If Texas didn’t have decent history
books in its classrooms, people might actually buy this scary story. But as
those books show, malaria was eradicated in Texas and the USA during the 1950s,
thanks to DDT, window screens and medical advances – not because the state’s
climate got too hot or cold, wet or dry for anopheles mosquitoes.
Moreover, from 1980 to 1999 there
were 62,514 cases of dengue fever (from mosquito bites) in northeastern Mexico.
Meanwhile, just across the border, only 64 cases of dengue were counted in
Texas. The disparate disease rates are clearly not due to the climate, but to
differences in housing, medical care, wealth and technology.
The alarmists need to get their
computer models, scenarios, scare stories and climate cops out of Texas. If
they don’t, Governor Perry and his Texas Rangers should arrest them for
violating Lone Star rights to energy, jobs, health and the American Dream.
Paul Driessen is senior policy advisor for the Committee For
A Constructive Tomorrow and Congress of Racial Equality. Willie Soon is an
independent climate scientist and solar physicist. Both are pro-Texas climate
rationalists, who rely on evidence-based science and don’t get spooked by GIGO
computer scenarios and Hollywood monsters.
Click here to return to TRA's Issue CCLXXIII Index.
Learn about Mr. Stolyarov's novel, Eden against the Colossus, here.Read Mr. Stolyarov's comprehensive treatise, A Rational Cosmology, explicating such terms as the universe, matter, space, time, sound, light, life, consciousness, and volition, here.
The
Rational Argumentator