The Cost of the Health Care "Fix":
Now They Tell Us...

Neither point is at all surprising. Among the things that are most responsible for rising health care prices are increased technological sophistication and the lack of incentive for consumers and providers to take costs of an additional procedure into account. Increased technological sophistication is largely a good thing; we are able to successfully treat many conditions that were largely untreatable in the recent past. Studies by health care economists have clearly shown that technological advance has, overall, generated net benefits in terms of longer and healthier lives.
However, our system of third-party payments makes the cost of one more procedure effectively zero to an insured patient (and to many uninsured ones), and health care providers respond accordingly. And there's also defensive medicine; again, since the marginal cost to the patient is effectively zero, why shouldn't the provider order additional tests and procedures?
This helps explain why health care prices and spending are expected to continue rising, but why the acceleration in insurance price increases? This one is simple: the "fix" increases the insurance pool, and forbids rating based on individuals' actual health status ("pre-existing conditions"). Reinforcing this effect is the apparent fact that fines for not buying mandatory insurance are considerably less than the price of insurance, so healthy uninsured people will have an incentive to remain uninsured, and then purchase insurance if they become unhealthy. It doesn't take a degree in actuarial science to understand that this increases the riskiness of insurance pools, and hence rates.
These points are quite apart from concerns that the health care "fix" is fiscally unsound (e.g., my previous post). These are simply consequences of the facts that people respond to incentives -- including prices -- and that there's no free lunch. Unfortunately, our leaders are more interested in their own political power than in actually fixing problems, and hence have promoted this "fix" with demagoguery rather than logic and facts. But as time goes on, more and more unpleasant facts will come to light.
This article
originally appeared on the
Hillsdale-econ.com blog, a
new forum for the expression of economic ideas by professors Charles
Steele and Gary Wolfram of Hillsdale College.
Dr. Charles N. Steele is the Herman and
Suzanne Dettwiler Chair in
Economics and assistant professor at Hillsdale College in Hillsdale,
Michigan. His publications include papers on the Soviet economy and
economics of transition, economic growth, and institutional change. He
received his Ph.D. in economics from New York University in 1997, and
has subsequently taught economics at the graduate and undergraduate
levels in the People’s Republic of China (China Agricultural
University), the Russian Federation (Moscow State University), Ukraine
(Economics Education and Research Consortium, National University
Kyiv-Mohyla Academy), and the United States (Montana State University).
He has also worked as a private consultant in design and review of USDA
crop insurance programs with Watts and Associates, Inc.
In addition to economics, Steele's interests include trail running, mountaineering, snowshoeing, and similar outdoor pursuits. He's completed 26 ultramarathons, ten triathlons, and is a nine times finisher of The United States' oldest 50 mile race, the Le Grizz Ultramarathon.
Click here to return to TRA's Issue CCXLVI Index.
Learn about Mr. Stolyarov's novel, Eden against the Colossus, here.Read Mr. Stolyarov's comprehensive treatise, A Rational Cosmology, explicating such terms as the universe, matter, space, time, sound, light, life, consciousness, and volition, here.
The
Rational Argumentator