Happy-Face Totalitarian Commercials

Three recent TV ads get our attention with totalitarianism. They do so to different degrees and in different ways. And they certainly are barometers of the shift in the popular culture in this once-free country.
Green Police
The first was the “Green Police” advertisement for Audi that was broadcast during this year’s Super Bowl. It starts with a clerk asking a customer that standard question, “Paper or plastic?” When the customer answers the latter, Green Police swoop in and cuff him with the words, “You picked the wrong day to mess with the eco-system.”
A man is asked by the
eco-cops whether he installed the lights on his house; next we see them
hauling him away as a news reporter announces that “a man has just been
arrested for possession of an incandescent lightbulb.” Another
jackbooter empties illegal plastic water bottles and a bather is
dragged out of his hot tub for having the temperature too high.
As Green Police on
Segways man a roadblock, they allow the guy in the Audi to drive on
through because he has a “clean diesel” car.
The ad does get our
attention, as is its goal. But does it suggest that an Al Gore Gestapo
is a good thing? And what the hell were the Audi folks thinking?
Perhaps the ad’s authors were hoping with this subject matter to catch the PR lightning of the now-legendary Apple computer commercial
that aired during the 1984 Super Bowl. In that ad we see an auditorium
with Big Brother on a giant screen haranguing a cowering crowd of
identically uniformed prisoners. A beautiful female runner jogs into
the hall and hurls a huge hammer at the screen, destroying it and
freeing the inmates from the tyranny of IBM as imagined by Steve Jobs.
Whether you think Big
Blue was the devil or not is not the point. That commercial clearly was
assuming that the audience would reject anything that smacked of an
Orwellian 1984 world.
The Audi commercial
perhaps was having some fun with what might seem to be just a few steps
in the future if the logic of eco-cult is played out in our society.
And perhaps in the future, when folks complain as new environmental
restrictions tighten around their necks, they’ll say, “It’s like in
that Audi commercial.”
Still, the car in the Audi ad doesn’t smash a repressive system as the Apple computer jogger did. Rather, it escapes repression by complying with the system. This is certainly a bad subliminal cultural message, and it’s shocking to think that a company would think such a message could enhance the image of its brand in a free and individualist society.
Banning food
The second commercial isn’t as graphically interesting as the Audi one but is much more approving of repression, which makes it more dangerous.
We see happy-looking children and generally beautiful people smiling, playing, and frolicking. We hear the voice-over tell us, “
The ad then touts Smart Balance, a butter substitute. It concludes, “Our taste is so great that the folks over in
Okay, that’s a cute
final line, the sort of thing an ad strives for. But this commercial
presents a government banning individuals from doing as they please in
a very private matter—eating—as a great idea. The ad’s premise is
obviously that it is right for a paternalist state to limit the liberty
of us poor, stupid peasants for our own good.
The existence of this
ad is an indication that the culture of freedom has deteriorated enough
that the Smart Balance folks don’t worry about losing customers who,
while they might like the company’s healthy products, would be outraged
by its sick political morality. Perhaps the company is appealing to a
niche market, the eco-cultists who are paternalist in sentiment to
begin with. Otherwise, by presenting government bans on products as
happy-faced occasions, this commercial brazenly undermines the ethos of
freedom in this country.
Pimping for a dictator
The final commercial,
which has been around since 2006, is the most morally disgraceful. It
features Joseph Kennedy Jr., the son of the late senator Robert Kennedy
and nephew of JFK, pimping for the Venezuelan president and strongman
Hugo Chávez.
The commercial is for the oil company Citgo.
We see poor Americans complaining that they have to wear sweaters and
sleep in the kitchen by the stove because they can’t afford heating
oil. Joe Kennedy then announces 40 percent off heating oil for such
folks “from our friends in
So what’s wrong with this sort of help-the-poor stuff?
He has increased the
government’s control over the economy. His policies have led to
shortages of electricity and water in his country and thus a surplus of
misery for the Venezuelan people.
Chávez is trying to replace Fidel Castro as the hemisphere’s most virulent America-hater. He has welcomed
Citgo is
This brings us to the Citgo commercial. While it doesn’t mention Chávez, it does tout
But Joe Kennedy
chooses to pimp for this dictator. The Kennedy name still has a certain
caché, and Joe’s appearance in the commercial is a stamp of approval on
Chavez’s anti-American enterprise. Citgo officials are betting that
most Americans pay little attention to who’s behind its company and
what agenda is being touted. Fortunately, in this case many were paying
attention. A “Boycott Citgo” movement in the
Commercial message
The ideas that
underlie a culture often change for better or worse through indirect as
well as direct mechanisms. Most of us don’t pay close attention to TV
commercials, and the ad men making them up ultimately want to sell
products.
Dr. Edward Hudgins directs advocacy and is a senior scholar for The Atlas Society, the center for Objectivism in
For further reading:
*Thor Halvorssen, “Is John Galt Venezuelan?” Navigator January-February 2003.
*Edward Hudgins, “Pelosi’s Eco-Totalitarianism.” May 29, 2009.
Copyright, The Atlas Society. For more information, please visit www.atlassociety.org.
Click here to return to TRA's Issue CCXXXV Index.
Learn about Mr. Stolyarov's novel, Eden against the Colossus, here.Read Mr. Stolyarov's comprehensive treatise, A Rational Cosmology, explicating such terms as the universe, matter, space, time, sound, light, life, consciousness, and volition, here.
The
Rational Argumentator