This essay is the third in a series designed to dissect
the totalitarian mentality portrayed in George Orwell's
1984 and to draw parallels to trends in modern
academia and the sociopolitical arena of today. The
following is an index of previous portions of this
commentary:
1. Collectivism
2. Antiprogressivism
3.
Relativism
4.
Doublethink
5.
Popular Culture
6.
Newspeak
7. Vaporization -
You are here. Read on to
continue your analysis of this topic.
Dissent.
The fear of that word and it alone had resulted in
reactionary institutions of mass hypnotism, such as
doublethink, popular "culture", and Newspeak. All of the
above are pre-emptive measures which concentrate upon
assimilating the mind of the common man into the Witch
Doctor paradigm, thus rendering him an eternal slave of
the Party. Yet such measures, as is apparent, would not
possess a similar function concerning already divergent
individuals, Winston Smith being Mr. Orwell's example of
one. Alas, a horrifying tactic for their elimination
has, too, been devised by the oligarchy.
It is a common feature of totalitarian orders of chaos
to constantly survey their subjects to note tendencies
toward defiance and thwart them prior to escalation. The
tyrannies which existed prior to the brief interlude of
liberty, the Enlightenment/Gilded Age (circa 1700-1914
by the Orwellian calendar and taking into account the
parallel universe he had created containing the world of
Ingsoc) possessed not the technology nor the adequate
knowledge of human nature to monitor the thoughts of
their subjects. Their satisfaction emerged from a mere
physical subservience, for during that time it was
viewed as self-evident that reality was one and
objective, and that the truth was incapable of being
altered by the dominant paradigm (which as a result
claimed to have communication with a power greater than
itself, namely that of God. The potency of the Holy
Inquisition and the divine right monarchs rested upon
their claim to representation of a higher truth, not, in
the manner of the Party, to sole determination of that
truth's identity.). Power to inflict suffering itself
was, too, not their foremost objective. The autocrats of
the past merely desired an eternal material prosperity,
perhaps at the expense of the remainder of the nation's
social mobility, but not for the purpose of the
latter condition. Therefore technological progress and a
gradual formation of a middle class through the
ingenious conceptions of such men as Mr. Locke, Monsieur
de Voltaire, and Mr. Jefferson eventually displaced
them, for the old elite withered away in its permission
of such liberties as were necessary to elevate the
individual and transition to a meritocracy, where power
is constantly shifting, yet security for all is
guaranteed, where it is, most significantly, in the
hands of individuals, not collectives. Yet Party
domination is severe to an immensely greater degree; one
that does not possess such prospects for hope. O'Brien
explains: "You are a flaw in the pattern, Winston. You
are a stain that must be wiped out. Did I not tell you
just now that we are different from the persecutors of
the past? We are not content with negative obedience,
nor even with the most abject submission. When finally
you surrender to us, it must be of your own free will.
We do not destroy the heretic because he resists us; so
long as he resists us we never destroy him. We convert
him, we capture his inner mind, we reshape him. We burn
all evil and all illusion out of him; we bring him over
to our side, not in appearance, but genuinely, in heart
and soul. We make him one of ourselves before we kill
him. It is intolerable to us that an erroneous thought
should exist anywhere in the world, however secret and
powerless it may be. Even in the instant of death we
cannot permit any deviation. In the old days the heretic
walked to the stake still a heretic, proclaiming his
heresy, exulting in it. Even the victim of the Russian
purges could carry rebellion locked up in his skull as
he walked down the passage waiting for the bullet. But
we make the brain perfect before we blow it out. The
command of the old despotisms was 'Thou shalt not.' The
command of the totalitarians was, 'Thou shalt.' Our
command is 'Thou art.' No one whom we bring to this
place ever stands out against us. Everyone is washed
clean. Even those miserable traitors in whose innocence
you once believed-- Jones, Aaronson, and Rutherford-- in
the end we broke them down. I took part in their
interrogation myself. I saw them gradually worn down,
whimpering, groveling, weeping-- and in the end it was
not with pain or fear, only with penitence. By the time
we had finished with them they were only the shells of
men. There was nothing left in them except sorrow for
what they had done, and love of Big Brother. It was
touching to see how they loved him. They begged to be
shot quickly, so that they could die while their minds
were still clean." (p. 210)
The Party comprehends that dissent is bred within the
mind, and so long as individuals retain an adamant hold
on divergent conceptions, they will serve as either
guides or martyrs for progressive movements. Therefore
it is a necessity for them to not merely suppress the
opposition via brute force, but rather to mold the mind
of the target and indoctrinate it into the condition of
slavery, of submission and obedience. This is the
purpose of a lengthy "rehabilitation" program which
initiates the vaporization process. If and only if a man
concedes that his cause is immoral and his ends contrary
to the desired state, can the "desired state" demolish
him. Only when one concedes a framework which holds as
the ultimate virtue the infliction of suffering can the
framework inflict suffering upon him. Yet suffering is
not the ultimate misfortune encountered by the victim.
Martyrs may still become bred should "conversions"
become public, should the extent of the torment,
employed to suffocate a voice unbound, escape into the
minds of future dissenters. It becomes a necessity to
destruct the very existence of such ideas, even the fact
that "thought criminals" have converted from
them. Then the question becomes, "What had been the
reason for their arrest and torture in the first place?"
The answer concocted by Party bureaucrats is, "There is
no reason, particularly because there was no such crime
and no such criminal. The man of whom you speak had
never existed!" Hence is born the conception of the
"mutability of the past" essential to the perpetuation
of the Witch Doctors and the inability of contrary
mentalities to spread or even survive. "All the
confessions that are uttered here are true. We make them
true. And, above all, we do not allow the dead to rise
up against us. You must stop imagining that posterity
will vindicate you, Winston. Posterity will never hear
of you. You will be lifted clean out from the stream of
history. We shall turn you into gas and pour you into
the stratosphere. Nothing will remain of you; not a name
in the register, not a memory in a living brain. You
will be annihilated in the past as well as in the
future. You will never have existed." (p. 210) According
to relativist absurdities, not only is the Earth the
center of the universe and the stars minor specks
several kilometers away, but the individual's existence
is warranted only by the Party's approval of it. The
past, believe the Witch Doctors, exists, as everything
else, solely in the human mind, and if it were there
extinguished it would bear no consequences nor
sufficient validity to consider it in the future. From
the perspective of objectivity and a necessity for
external control as an essential means to survival, such
an approach would result in species destruction. From
the misconstrued values of "blackwhite", i.e. evil as
good, however, it seems perfectly functional in the
securing of such aims as the oligarchs had arbitrarily
ordained for themselves.
Martyrdom becomes no longer possible as a result of such
a three-step process to which Mr. Smith in the end falls
victim. The foremost step is commonly referred to as
rehabilitation, or the process of reintroducing a
deviant thinker into the dominant paradigm. This
practice, however, is applied only to so-called "thought
criminals". The common murderers, thieves, rapists, and
other instillers of chaos into the public and plagues of
the innocent are treated with leniency and granted
insignificant penalties for their misdeeds. "The
positions of trust were given only to the common
criminals, especially the gangsters and the murderers,
who formed a sort of aristocracy. All the dirty jobs
were done by the politicals." (p. 188) For a society
which bases its hierarchy upon the infliction of chaos
and terror this no longer seems a surprise. The Party,
as has been previously explored, seeks as a foremost
goal the dominance of destructive emotions. It is merely
the noble and uplifting that they seek to destroy, and
the rehabilitation process, a combination of pain and
crafty ideological argumentation (with fundamental flaws
that persons as late in the history of Oceania as Mr.
Smith are unable to wholly identify), proves inevitably
functional in the end, rendering the individual
susceptible to the imminent annihilation.
The key to the success of the rehabilitative program,
however, lies in the assertion, transmitted by men such
as O'Brien, that the target's mind is deviant not due to
aspirations for a better world but a malfunction in the
mind, a mental disease. "You are mentally deranged. You
suffer from a defective memory. You are unable to
remember real events, and you persuade yourself that you
remember other events which never happened. Fortunately
it is curable. You have never cured yourself of it,
because you did not choose to. There was a small effort
of the will that you were not ready to make." (p. 203)
As mental illnesses are wholly subjective and
arbitrarily defined in nature (being the ultimate denial
of man's volitional capacity, which can be performed in
a myriad of ways, none of which resonate with reality),
they are safe ground for the orthodoxy, and the dominant
paradigm will, if aware of them, utilize them for the
suppression of contrary ideas, most significantly the
notion of objective reality, which is objectively the
characteristic of a healthy mind, but, in the world of
Ingsoc, prevents the grasping of diseased conceptions
such as that of the "mutability of the past." As a
result of the reversal of the matters considered
"healthy" and "ill" (as expected in a society which
deems evil to be the sole good), O'Brien possesses
argumentative ground to "persuade" Smith that he is in
reality acting for Smith's own benefit! This
sparks a relationship of blind trust, in this
case, of expertitis as a gateway to the
"conversion."
Afterward, stage two, the physical recovery of the
individual and his subsequent murder, can be enacted
with swiftness, as this is what the individual (refer
back to the examples of subversives Rutherford,
Aaronson, and Jones) earnestly desires for his past
"defiance" and as a result of a wish to act in
accordance with the will of the Party, even in cases
when such will aims to destroy the particular
individual. Stage three of the vaporization process, of
course, is the "cleansing" of the "offender" from the
"past". "-'You do not exist,' said O'Brien. Once again
the sense of helplessness assailed him. He knew, or he
could imagine, the arguments which proved his own
nonexistence; but they were nonsense, they were only a
play on words. Did not the statement, 'You do not
exist,' contain a logical absurdity? But what use was it
to say so? His mind shriveled as he thought of the
unanswerable, mad arguments with which O'Brien would
demolish him." (p. 214) O'Brien was here referring to
the Party's course of action to be undertaken following
Smith's submission. Already, through his perception that
he was unable to respond or to resist using logic and
objectivity, Smith was ensuring his own susceptibility
to the eternal destruction. He would continue to have
existed in the objective past, yet such an existence
would not be recognized by slave ducks perpetually bound
to the oligarchy as a result.
G. Stolyarov II
is a science fiction novelist, independent philosophical
essayist, poet, amateur mathematician, composer,
contributor to
Enter Stage Right,
Le Quebecois Libre,
Rebirth of Reason,
and the
Ludwig von Mises Institute,
Senior Writer for
The Liberal Institute,
and Editor-in-Chief of
The Rational Argumentator,
a magazine championing the principles of reason, rights,
and progress. His newest science fiction novel is
Eden against the Colossus.
His latest non-fiction treatise is
A Rational Cosmology.
Mr. Stolyarov can be contacted at
gennadystolyarovii@yahoo.com.
This TRA feature has been edited
in accordance with TRA’s
Statement of Policy.
Click here to return to TRA's Issue
XIII Index.
Learn about Mr. Stolyarov's novel,
Eden against the Colossus, here.
Read
Mr. Stolyarov's new comprehensive treatise,
A Rational Cosmology,
explicating such terms as the universe, matter, space, time,
sound, light, life, consciousness, and volition, at
http://www.geocities.com/rational_argumentator/rc.html.
]
|